Author, Australia
The Shariah and Australian Family Law: Conflict or Compatability?
Abstract
The
majority of Muslim migrants come to Australia from countries where
family law is governed by the Shariah (Islamic law). In these countries,
religious courts give effect to laws based on the Quran and Sunnah and are
presided over by Shariah court judges who hear and determine matrimonial
disputes between Muslims. By way of contrast, Australia has a secular family law
system based originally on English common law and developed into its modern
form through modern legislation. So far, the Australian government has been
adamant that the one secular system must prevail throughout the country and
that it will recognize no separate family law rules based on religion.
Nevertheless, the Shariah binds all Muslims in a personal capacity, and this
sometimes places them in a dilemma as they struggle to navigate a way between
the Australian law which binds them as citizens and the Shariah which embodies
their religious beliefs.
This
paper sets out to examine the relationship between the Shariah and Australian family law. It will consider the concept of the family in
both systems and whether any form of legal pluralism appears to be possible,
now or in the future. It will consider similarities and differences in the
rules which relate to marriage, relationships within the family, divorce,
responsibilities towards children, adoption and other family related matters.
It will address some contentious issues: should the Australian legal system
recognise the Shariah? Should Australian Muslims be allowed to live in
accordance with Shariah rules if they choose to do so? Can or should the
Shariah itself adapt and integrate into the mainstream Australian family law
system?
Finally
the paper takes a look at how Australian Muslims are coping with family law in
everyday life, and explores some new initiatives suggested by Australian imams
to overcome the religious difficulties which some Australian Muslims face in
family law matters. In particular it looks at proposals by some Muslim
religious leaders to establish a religious tribunal or committee of imams to
hear, counsel and advise Muslim couples with marriage difficulties, and the
legal, administrative and social implications of such as scheme.
Bio
Jamila Hussein graduated in Arts & Law from Sydney University
and practised law as a solicitor in suburban practice for approximately 10
years, before taking up teaching Law, first at TAFE and later at University.
Between 1992 & 1994 Jamila and her family lived in Kuala
Lumpur, where Jamila taught common law at the International Islamic University,
and at the same time studied Shariah law, and gained her Diploma in Shariah Law
& Practice and MCL (Masters in Comparative law).
After returning to Australia,
Jamila worked for two years at the Centre for South East Asian Law at Northern Territory University. She is currently a lecturer
at UTS, teaching Islamic law and Asian Law & Legal Systems.
In recent years, she has been actively involved with the
Muslim community in Australia,
has been a member of the ‘Engaging with Women’ committee of the Muslim
Community Reference Group and has a particular interest in the relationship
between Australian law and Islamic law, as well as multiculturalism and
interfaith issues.
She is also a member of the Women’s Interfaith Network.
|